Reliability of Navigated Knee Stability Examination
Background: Clinical examination remains empirical and may be confusing in the setting of rotatory knee instabilities. Computerized navigation systems provide the ability to visualize and quantify coupled knee motions during knee stability examination. Hypothesis: An image-free navigation system can...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of sports medicine Vol. 35; no. 8; p. 1315 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Baltimore
American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
01-08-2007
Sage Publications Ltd |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: Clinical examination remains empirical and may be confusing in the setting of rotatory knee instabilities. Computerized navigation
systems provide the ability to visualize and quantify coupled knee motions during knee stability examination.
Hypothesis: An image-free navigation system can reliably register and collect multiplanar knee kinematics during knee stability examination.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Coupled knee motions were determined by a robotic/UFS testing system and by an image-free navigation system in 6 cadaveric
knees that were subjected to (1) isolated varus stress and (2) combined varus and external rotation force at 0°, 30°, and
60°. This protocol was performed in intact knees and after complete sectioning of the posterolateral corner (lateral collateral
ligament, popliteus tendon, and popliteofibular ligament). The correlation between data from the surgical navigation system
and the robotic positional sensor was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. The 3-dimensional motion paths
of the intact and sectioned knees were assessed qualitatively using the navigation display system.
Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients between the robotic sensor and the navigation system for varus and external rotation
at 0°, 30°, and 60° were all statistically significant at P < .01. The overall intraclass correlation coefficient for all tests was 0.9976 ( P < .0001). Real-time visualization of the coupled motions was possible with the navigation system. Post hoc analysis of the
knee motion paths during loading distinguished distinct rotatory patterns.
Conclusion: Surgical navigation is a precise intraoperative tool to quantify knee stability examination and may help delineate pathologic
multiplanar or coupled knee motions, particularly in the setting of complex rotatory instability patterns. Repeatability of
load application during clinical stability testing remains problematic.
Clinical Relevance: Surgical navigation may refine the diagnostic evaluation of knee instability.
Keywords:
surgical navigation
computer-assisted surgery
posterolateral corner
knee instability |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-5465 1552-3365 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0363546507300821 |