Life cycle assessment of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket sludge management and activated sludge systems aiming energy use in the municipality of Itajubá, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Life cycle assessment of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket sludge management and activated sludge systems aiming energy use in the municipality of Itajubá, Minas Gerais, Brazil

This study aimed to carry out the Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) targeting to decide the better management system for sludge from both Activated Sludge Process (ASP) and from Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB). Using the SimaPro ® software, three post-use scenarios were applied to this process for ea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of material cycles and waste management Vol. 23; no. 5; pp. 1810 - 1830
Main Authors: Cañote, Susan Johana Benites, Barros, Regina Mambeli, Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva, dos Santos, Ivan Felipe Silva, Silva, Ana Paula Moni, Piñas, Jean Agustin Velásquez, Cañote, Alexandra Lucitania Benites, de Castro e Silva, Hellen Luisa
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Tokyo Springer Japan 01-09-2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Activated sludge
Activated sludge process
Aluminum
Anaerobic digestion
Anaerobic processes
Biogas
Civil Engineering
Energy consumption
Engineering
Environmental Management
Fertilizers
Heavy metals
Landfills
Life cycle analysis
Life cycle assessment
Life cycles
Original Article
Scanning electron microscopy
Sludge
Sludge digestion
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors
Waste disposal sites
Waste Management/Waste Technology
Brazil
Activated sludge
Biogas
UASB sludge
Life cycle analysis
Anaerobic digestion
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study aimed to carry out the Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) targeting to decide the better management system for sludge from both Activated Sludge Process (ASP) and from Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB). Using the SimaPro ® software, three post-use scenarios were applied to this process for each type of sludge: Scenario A, which consisted of the option of disposing of UASB sludge in a sanitary landfill; Scenario B, in anaerobic digestion (AD) with the generation of biogas and electricity and use of digested sludge; and Scenario C, the use of UASB sludge as an agricultural fertilizer. Besides, we carried out the analysis of heavy metals in the sludge before and after the AD using the Scanning Electron Microscopy. The elements found with a marked presence in the treatment of UASB and ASP sludge samples, before and after AD, were, among others: Oxygen, Carbon, Aluminum, Silicon, and Iron. The energy avoided for UASB sludge is 0.0502 MJ. For activated sludge, it is 0.00173 MJ. The use of activated sludge as an agricultural fertilizer (Scenario C) presented the best performance in eight of the eleven categories due to the presence of products avoided in the process.
ISSN:1438-4957
1611-8227
DOI:10.1007/s10163-021-01253-0