A Collaborative Approach to Bridging the Gap Between Wildlife Managers and Researchers

Although most wildlife professionals agree that science should inform wildlife management decisions, disconnect still exists between researchers and managers. If researchers are not striving to incorporate their findings into management decisions, support for research programs by managers can wane....

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	The Journal of wildlife management Vol. 83; no. 8; pp. 1644 - 1651
Main Authors:	MERKLE, JEROD A., ANDERSON, NEIL J., BAXLEY, DANNA L., CHOPP, MATTHEW, GIGLIOTTI, LAURA C., GUDE, JUSTIN A., HARMS, TYLER M., JOHNSON, HEATHER E., MERRILL, EVELYN H., MITCHELL, MICHAEL S., MONG, TONY W., NELSON, JERRY, NORTON, ANDREW S., SHERIFF, MICHAEL J., TOMASIK, ERIC, VANBEEK, KELLY R.
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Bethesda Wiley 01-11-2019 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:	Collaboration Commentary Conservation organizations co‐development of science Decision making Decisions Incentives joint ventures Management decisions Research programs research steering committees Researchers structured decision‐making Wildlife conservation Wildlife management wildlife research
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Although most wildlife professionals agree that science should inform wildlife management decisions, disconnect still exists between researchers and managers. If researchers are not striving to incorporate their findings into management decisions, support for research programs by managers can wane. If managers are not using research findings to inform management decisions, those decisions may be less effective or more vulnerable to legal challenges. Both of these situations can have negative consequences for wildlife conservation. We outline a collaborative research-management approach to bridging the gap between wildlife managers and researchers. We describe differences in perspectives, perceptions, and priorities between managers and researchers; outline how and why the divide between researchers and managers has likely occurred and continues to grow; and present specific strategies and recommendations to foster stronger collaborations between managers and researchers. We advocate increased synergy between managers and researchers based on a shared vision of conservation and a collaborative structure that rewards researchers and managers. Most importantly, we suggest that relationships and communication between managers and researchers must be established early in research development and decision-making processes, fostering the trust needed for collaboration. Institutions and agencies can facilitate these relationships by creating opportunities and incentives for integrating collaborative research into management decisions. We suggest this approach will strengthen ties between researchers and managers, increase relevance of research to management decisions, promote effectiveness of management decisions, reduce legal challenges, and ultimately produce positive, tangible, and lasting effects on wildlife conservation.
Bibliography:	jmerkle@uwyo.edu E‐mail :
ISSN:	0022-541X 1937-2817
DOI:	10.1002/jwmg.21759