Negative impact of clinical misdiagnosis of measles on health workers' confidence in measles vaccine

We conducted a survey to determine the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of measles in Zimbabwe. Between December 1996 and February 1997, we collected blood samples and clinical and demographic information from a sample of 105 children with a clinical diagnosis of measles. A clinical case of measle...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Epidemiology and infection Vol. 132; no. 1; pp. 7 - 10
Main Authors: HELFAND, R. F., CHIBI, T., BIELLIK, R., SHEARLEY, A., BELLINI, W. J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01-02-2004
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We conducted a survey to determine the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of measles in Zimbabwe. Between December 1996 and February 1997, we collected blood samples and clinical and demographic information from a sample of 105 children with a clinical diagnosis of measles. A clinical case of measles was defined as a person with a history of fever, rash for three or more days, and either cough, coryza, or conjunctivitis. A laboratory-confirmed case of measles or rubella had IgM antibodies against measles virus or rubella virus respectively. A total of 91% of children met the clinical case definition. Among those who met the clinical case definition for measles, 72% were IgM-positive for measles virus only, 23% were IgM-positive for rubella virus only, 3% were IgM-positive for both measles and rubella viruses, and 2% were IgM-negative for both viruses. This study demonstrates the importance of considering selective laboratory confirmation of measles in periods of high disease incidence when the effectiveness of the vaccine is questioned.
Bibliography:istex:EDD0D349D8AB5B7C34E14CFF26CA01DC12D15FD6
PII:S0950268803001547
ark:/67375/6GQ-1TC644N6-X
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0950-2688
1469-4409
DOI:10.1017/S0950268803001547