Search Results - "Brookes, Sara T"

Refine Results
  1. 1

    The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 by Williamson, Paula R, Altman, Douglas G, Bagley, Heather, Barnes, Karen L, Blazeby, Jane M, Brookes, Sara T, Clarke, Mike, Gargon, Elizabeth, Gorst, Sarah, Harman, Nicola, Kirkham, Jamie J, McNair, Angus, Prinsen, Cecilia A C, Schmitt, Jochen, Terwee, Caroline B, Young, Bridget

    “…The selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial when designing clinical trials in order to compare the effects of different interventions directly. For the…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  2. 2

    A systematic review of core outcome set development studies demonstrates difficulties in defining unique outcomes by Young, Amber E, Brookes, Sara T, Avery, Kerry N.L, Davies, Anna, Metcalfe, Chris, Blazeby, Jane M

    Published in Journal of clinical epidemiology (01-11-2019)
    “…AbstractObjectivesCore outcome set (COS) development often begins with a systematic review to identify outcomes. Reviews frequently show heterogeneity in…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

    A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals by Toerien, Merran, Brookes, Sara T, Metcalfe, Chris, de Salis, Isabel, Tomlin, Zelda, Peters, Tim J, Sterne, Jonathan, Donovan, Jenny L

    “…Poor recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is problematic but common. Clear and detailed reporting of participant…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  7. 7

    Impact of question order on prioritisation of outcomes in the development of a core outcome set: a randomised controlled trial by Brookes, Sara T, Chalmers, Katy A, Avery, Kerry N L, Coulman, Karen, Blazeby, Jane M

    “…Core outcome set (COS) developers increasingly employ Delphi surveys to elicit stakeholders' opinions of which outcomes to measure and report in trials of a…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  8. 8

    'Trial Exegesis': Methods for Synthesizing Clinical and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Data in Trials to Inform Clinical Practice. A Systematic Review by McNair, Angus G K, Macefield, Rhiannon C, Blencowe, Natalie S, Brookes, Sara T, Blazeby, Jane M

    Published in PloS one (29-08-2016)
    “…The CONSORT extension for patient reported outcomes (PROs) aims to improve reporting, but guidance on the optimal integration with clinical data is lacking…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  9. 9
  10. 10

    Communicating the Results of Randomized Clinical Trials: Do Patients Understand Multidimensional Patient-Reported Outcomes? by MCNAIR, Angus G. K, BROOKES, Sara T, DAVIS, Christopher R, ARGYROPOULOS, Miltiadis, BLAZEBY, Jane M

    Published in Journal of clinical oncology (10-02-2010)
    “…PURPOSE Evidence suggests that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from randomized trials in oncology may not influence clinical decision making and patient…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  11. 11

    Standards of Outcome Reporting in Surgical Oncology: A Case Study in Esophageal Cancer by Blencowe, Natalie S., McNair, Angus G. K., Davis, Christopher R., Brookes, Sara T., Blazeby, Jane M.

    Published in Annals of surgical oncology (01-12-2012)
    “…Background Multimodal strategies before surgery are often used to improve outcomes, but disease progression (precluding surgical resection) and inoperability…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  12. 12

    Reporting of Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review by BLENCOWE, Natalie S, STRONG, Sean, MCNAIR, Angus G. K, BROOKES, Sara T, CROSBY, Tom, MICHAEL GRIFFIN, S, BLAZEBY, Jane M

    Published in Annals of surgery (01-04-2012)
    “…This review summarizes reporting of complications of esophageal cancer surgery. Accurate assessment of morbidity and mortality after surgery for cancer is…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  13. 13

    Development of a Core Outcome Set for Clinical Effectiveness Trials in Esophageal Cancer Resection Surgery by Avery, Kerry N L, Chalmers, Katy A, Brookes, Sara T, Blencowe, Natalie S, Coulman, Karen, Whale, Katie, Metcalfe, Chris, Blazeby, Jane M

    Published in Annals of surgery (01-04-2018)
    “…OBJECTIVE:Development of a core outcome set (COS) for clinical effectiveness trials in esophageal cancer resection surgery. BACKGROUND:Inconsistency and…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  14. 14

    Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 4: Debate on Paper 1 from the perspective of COMET [Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials] by Williamson, Paula R., Blazeby, Jane M., Brookes, Sara T., Clarke, Mike, Terwee, Caroline B., Young, Bridget

    Published in Journal of clinical epidemiology (01-09-2020)
    “…•These comments are provided by authors of the COMET Handbook: The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017) Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  15. 15

    Core Items for a Standardized Resource Use Measure: Expert Delphi Consensus Survey by Thorn, Joanna C., Brookes, Sara T., Ridyard, Colin, Riley, Ruth, Hughes, Dyfrig A., Wordsworth, Sarah, Noble, Sian M., Thornton, Gail, Hollingworth, William

    Published in Value in health (01-06-2018)
    “…Resource use measurement by patient recall is characterized by inconsistent methods and a lack of validation. A validated standardized resource use measure…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Suicide rates in young men in England and Wales in the 21st century: time trend study by Biddle, Lucy, Brock, Anita, Brookes, Sara T, Gunnell, David

    Published in BMJ (08-03-2008)
    “…Objectives To explore trends in suicide in young people to investigate the recent observation that after year on year rises in the 1970s, 1980s, and early…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  19. 19
  20. 20

    Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs) by Macefield, Rhiannon C, Jacobs, Marc, Korfage, Ida J, Nicklin, Joanna, Whistance, Robert N, Brookes, Sara T, Sprangers, Mirjam A G, Blazeby, Jane M

    Published in Trials (05-02-2014)
    “…Synthesis of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data is hindered by the range of available PRO measures (PROMs) composed of multiple scales and single items with…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article