TRUS-MRI image registration: a paradigm shift in the diagnosis of significant prostate cancer

Accuracy of multiparametric MRI has greatly improved the ability of localizing tumor foci of prostate cancer. This property can be used to perform a TRUS-MR image registration, new technological advance, which allows for an overlay of an MRI onto a TRUS image to target a prostate biopsy toward a sus...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Abdominal imaging Vol. 38; no. 6; p. 1447
Main Authors:	Cornud, F, Brolis, L, Delongchamps, N Barry, Portalez, D, Malavaud, B, Renard-Penna, R, Mozer, P
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	United States 01-12-2013
Subjects:	Biopsy, Needle Humans Image Enhancement - methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Multimodal Imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods Ultrasonography - methods
Online Access:	Get more information
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Accuracy of multiparametric MRI has greatly improved the ability of localizing tumor foci of prostate cancer. This property can be used to perform a TRUS-MR image registration, new technological advance, which allows for an overlay of an MRI onto a TRUS image to target a prostate biopsy toward a suspicious area Three types of registration have been developed: cognitive-based, sensor-based, and organ-based registration. Cognitive registration consists of aiming a suspicious area during biopsy with the knowledge of the lesion location identified on multiparametric MRI. Sensor-based registration consists of tracking in real time the TRUS probe with a magnetic device, achieving a global positioning system which overlays in real-time prostate image on both modalities. Its main limitation is that it does not take into account prostate and patient motion during biopsy. Two systems (Artemis and Uronav) have been developed to partially circumvent this drawback. Organ-based registration (Koelis) does not aim to track the TRUS probe, but the prostate itself to compute in a 3D acquisition the TRUS prostate shape, allowing for a registration with the corresponding 3D MRI shape. This system is not limited by prostate/patient motion and allows for a deformation of the organ during registration. Pros and cons of each technique and the rationale for a targeted biopsy only policy are discussed.
ISSN:	1432-0509
DOI:	10.1007/s00261-013-0018-4