Search Results - "Brodsky, Stanley L"

The Gold Standard and the Pyrite Principle: Toward a Supplemental Frame of Reference by Brodsky, Stanley L, Lichtenstein, Bronwen

“…In medicine and social sciences, the phrase "gold standard" is often used to characterize an object or procedure described as unequivocally the best in its…”
Get full text

To Flatter The Jury: Ingratiation During Closing Arguments by Ziemke, Mitchell H., Brodsky, Stanley L.

“…Ingratiation is a powerful tool of persuasion in many settings. In the current study, participants read a description of a criminal case and then viewed a…”
Get full text

Collateral Consequences for Third-Party Interviewees in Forensic Contexts by Goldenson, Julie, Brodsky, Stanley L, Heilbrun, Kirk

“…Collateral interviews can be an integral source of third-party information used in a range of forensic mental health assessments. Although family members and…”
Get full text

Defendant Remorse, Need for Affect, and Juror Sentencing Decisions by Corwin, Emily P, Cramer, Robert J, Griffin, Desiree A, Brodsky, Stanley L

“…Defendant remorse is generally accepted as a mitigating factor in capital murder sentencing in the legal system. The current study addressed whether verbal and…”
Get full text

Trauma-Focused Mitigation Testimony in Capital Sentencing Hearings by Goldenson, Julie, Brodsky, Stanley L

“…When capital trials of convicted defendants reach the sentencing phase, forensic mental health experts often testify as part of mitigation evidence. Three…”
Get full text

Common Flaws in Forensic Reports by Brodsky, Stanley L., Pope, Kenneth S.

“…Flawed forensic psychological reports can create unfortunate, sometimes harmful, consequences, including (a) misinforming and misleading judges and juries; (b)…”
Get full text

Trauma-Informed Forensic Mental Health Assessment: Practical Implications, Ethical Tensions, and Alignment With Therapeutic Jurisprudence Principles by Goldenson, Julie, Brodsky, Stanley L., Perlin, Michael L.

“…The need for trauma-informed practice is well recognized across mental health and legal settings; however, relatively little has been written about its…”
Get full text

Forensic Psychologists' Perceptions of Bias and Potential Correction Strategies in Forensic Mental Health Evaluations by Neal, Tess M. S, Brodsky, Stanley L

“…A qualitative study with 20 board-certified forensic psychologists was followed up by a mail survey of 351 forensic psychologists in this mixed-methods…”
Get full text

Warmth and Competence on the Witness Stand: Implications for the Credibility of Male and Female Expert Witnesses by Neal, Tess M S, Guadagno, Rosanna E, Eno, Cassie A, Brodsky, Stanley L

“…In this study, we examined how manipulations of likeability and knowledge affected mock jurors' perceptions of female and male expert witness credibility (n =…”
Get full text

Risky Business: Addressing the Consequences of Predicting Violence by Miller, Sarah L, Brodsky, Stanley L

“…Despite major advances in the prediction of violence and risk management, risk evaluations are necessarily imperfect. This article focuses on the role of the…”
Get full text

Equivocal Findings in Forensic Evaluations by Coffey, C. Adam, Brodsky, Stanley L., Parrott, Caroline T., Avila, Andrea

“…One of the most vexing yet rarely discussed problems in forensic assessment is the equivocal result. The typical forensic mental health evaluation involves…”
Get full text

Credibility in the Courtroom: How Likeable Should an Expert Witness Be? by Brodsky, Stanley L, Neal, Tess M S, Cramer, Robert J, Ziemke, Mitchell H

“…This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between expert witness likeability and jurors' judgments of credibility and tendencies in sentencing…”
Get full text

Direct Observation of Defendant-Attorney Interactions in Assessing Abilities to Assist by Cox, Jennifer, Kois, Lauren E., Brodsky, Stanley L.

“…According to the United States Supreme Court ruling in Dusky v. United States (1960), to be competent to proceed, criminal defendants must factually and…”
Get full text

Distractions in Forensic Evaluations by Brodsky, Stanley L, Johnson, Lauren N

“…Although test manuals and professional guidelines universally specify that forensic assessments should take place in quiet, private, and distraction-free…”
Get full text

The Witness Credibility Scale: An outcome measure for expert witness research by Brodsky, Stanley L., Griffin, Michael P., Cramer, Robert J.

“…The judge or jury makes a subjective determination of when an expert is credible. However, no published measure exists for assessment of the credibility of…”
Get full text

Empathy in Forensic Evaluations: a Systematic Reconsideration by Brodsky, Stanley L., Wilson, Jennifer Kelly

“…This paper reexamines the Shuman seminal paper arguing against empathic behaviors in forensic evaluations. Shuman concluded that empathy by examiners seduces…”
Get full text

Raymond D. Fowler Jr. (1930-2015) by Brodsky, Stanley L., Kaslow, Nadine J.

“…Raymond D. Fowler Jr., a past president and chief executive officer (CEO) of the American Psychological Association (APA), and an internationally known leader…”
Get full text

Addressing the Perfect Phantom on the Witness Stand by Brodsky, Stanley L, Heller, Phil

“…When expert witnesses are cross-examined, a common gambit of opposing counsel is to create a phantom for comparison purposes. The constructed phantom is…”
Get full text

Medication state at the time of the offense: Medication noncompliance, insight and criminal responsibility by Parrott, Caroline Titcomb, Jones, Michelle A., Brodsky, Stanley L., Shealy, Clayton

“…This study used a mixed quantitative‐qualitative methodology to examine whether mock jurors considered a defendant's meta‐responsibility – specifically, the…”
Get full text

The 4 Ds of Forensic Mental Health Assessments of Personal Injury by Young, Gerald, Brodsky, Stanley L.

“…The field of psychiatric/psychological injury and law concerns tort and other legal claims for injuries sustained in events at issue, such as in motor vehicle…”
Get full text