Temporal contiguity determines overshadowing and potentiation of human Action-Outcome performance
Three experiments ( n = 81, n = 81, n = 82, respectively) explored how temporal contiguity influences Action-Outcome learning, assessing whether an intervening signal competed, facilitated, or had no effect on performance and causal attribution in undergraduate participants. Across experiments, we o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychonomic bulletin & review Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 350 - 361 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
Springer US
01-02-2023
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Three experiments (
n
= 81,
n
= 81,
n
= 82, respectively) explored how temporal contiguity influences Action-Outcome learning, assessing whether an intervening signal competed, facilitated, or had no effect on performance and causal attribution in undergraduate participants. Across experiments, we observed competition and facilitation as a function of the temporal contiguity between Action and Outcome. When there was a strong temporal relationship between Action and Outcome, the signal competed with the action, hindering instrumental performance but not causal attribution (Experiments
1
and
3
). However, with weak temporal contiguity, the same signal facilitated both instrumental performance and causal attribution (Experiments
1
and
2
). Finally, the physical intensity of the signal determined the magnitude of competition. As anticipated by associative learning models, a more salient signal attenuated to a greater extent instrumental performance (Experiment
3
). These results are discussed by reference to a recent adaptation of the configural theory of learning. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1069-9384 1531-5320 1531-5320 |
DOI: | 10.3758/s13423-022-02155-4 |