Religiosity and Spiritual/Religious Coping in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND: Spirituality/Religiosity (S/R) plays an important role in chronic diseases coping, improvement of quality of life (QL) and adherence to treatment. There is a gap in studies regarding Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) coping and if S/R can help in metabolic control and complications decreas...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Global journal of health science Vol. 14; no. 8; p. 29
Main Authors:	Rojas Fonseca, Elvi Cristina, da Silva, Adriana Paula, da Cunha Palhares, Heloísa Marcelina, Brasileiro Dias, Alzira Mara Cussi, Tomé, Janaíne Machado, Ribeiro, Flávia Alves, Rodrigues Mesquita, Izabelle Mara, Caetano Araujo, Ana Claúdia Moura, Borges, Maria de Fátima
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	25-07-2022
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	BACKGROUND: Spirituality/Religiosity (S/R) plays an important role in chronic diseases coping, improvement of quality of life (QL) and adherence to treatment. There is a gap in studies regarding Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) coping and if S/R can help in metabolic control and complications decrease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the religiosity profile and relevance of spiritual/religious coping in adult patients with T1DM. METHOD: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted in outpatient care in 56 T1DM patients in a tertiary service. Patients filled out questionnaires referring to demographic and clinical data, socioeconomic classification, the Index of Religiosity of the University of Duke - Duke scale (DUREL), and an adaptated Spiritual-Religious Coping scale (SRCOPE). RESULTS: The analysis of the positive SRCOPE (PSRCOPE) showed a low / medium score (3.3 ± 0.7), whereas for the negative SRCOPE (NSRCOPE) it was low (2.0 ± 0.7), and the use of the total SRCOPE was considered high (3.7 ± 0.4), the NSRCOPE/ PSRCOPE ratio was 0.7 ± 0.2, demonstrating a predominance of PSRCOPE in relation to NSRCOPE. The organizational, non-organizational and intrinsic religiosities presented a correlation with PSRCOPE and total SRCOPE. Only intrinsic religiosity showed a significant correlation with anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: It was found that non-organizational and intrinsic religiosity had a high index. The obtained score for positive and negative SRCOPE showed a PSRCOPE predominance. There was significant correlation, between the scores of religiosity and coping. The next step is to evaluate the impact of these findings in clinical practice.
ISSN:	1916-9736 1916-9744
DOI:	10.5539/gjhs.v14n8p29