The efficacy of laser therapy in wound repair: a meta-analysis of the literature

We determined the overall effects of laser therapy on tissue healing by aggregating the literature and subjecting studies meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria to statistical meta-analysis. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) devices have been in use since the mid sixties, but their therapeutic va...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Photomedicine and laser surgery Vol. 22; no. 3; p. 241
Main Authors:	Woodruff, Lynda D, Bounkeo, Julie M, Brannon, Windy M, Dawes, Kenneth S, Barham, Cameron D, Waddell, Donna L, Enwemeka, Chukuka S
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	United States 01-06-2004
Subjects:	Animals Humans Low-Level Light Therapy - methods Treatment Outcome Wound Healing - radiation effects
Online Access:	Get more information
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	We determined the overall effects of laser therapy on tissue healing by aggregating the literature and subjecting studies meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria to statistical meta-analysis. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) devices have been in use since the mid sixties, but their therapeutic value remains doubtful, as the literature seems replete with conflicting findings. Pertinent original research papers were gathered from library sources, online databases and secondary sources. The papers were screened and coded; those meeting every inclusion and exclusion criterion were subjected to meta-analysis, using Cohen's d. statistic to determine the treatment effect size of each study. Twenty-four studies with 31 effect sizes met the stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. The overall mean effect of laser therapy on wound healing was highly significant (d = +2.22). Sub-analyses of the data revealed significant positive effects on wound healing in animal experiments (d = +1.97) as well as human clinical studies (d = +0.54). The analysis further revealed significant positive effects on specific indices of healing, for example, acceleration of inflammation (d = +4.45); augmentation of collagen synthesis (d = +1.80); increased tensile strength (d = +2.37), reduced healing time (d = +3.24); and diminution of wound size (d = +0.55). The Fail-Safe number associated with the overall effect of laser therapy was 509; a high number representing the number of additional studies-in which laser therapy has negative or no effect on wound healing-required to negate the overall large effect size of +2.22. The corresponding Fail-Safe number for clinical studies was 22. We conclude that laser therapy is an effective tool for promoting wound repair.
ISSN:	1549-5418
DOI:	10.1089/1549541041438623