Effect of an 18-wk weight-training program on energy expenditure and physical activity
Ludo M. L. A. Van Etten, Klaas R. Westerterp, Frans T. J. Verstappen, Bart J. B. Boon, and Wim H. M. Saris Department of Human Biology and Department of Movement Sciences, University of Limburg, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands Received 26 March 1996; accepted in final form 5 September 1996. Van...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 82; no. 1; pp. 298 - 304 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Bethesda, MD
Am Physiological Soc
01-01-1997
American Physiological Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Ludo M. L. A.
Van Etten,
Klaas R.
Westerterp,
Frans T. J.
Verstappen,
Bart J. B.
Boon, and
Wim H. M.
Saris
Department of Human Biology and Department of Movement Sciences,
University of Limburg, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
Received 26 March 1996; accepted in final form 5 September 1996.
Van Etten, Ludo M. L. A., Klaas R. Westerterp, Frans T. J. Verstappen, Bart J. B. Boon, and Wim H. M. Saris. Effect of an
18-wk weight-training program on energy expenditure and physical
activity. J. Appl. Physiol. 82(1):
298-304, 1997. The purpose of this study was to examine the
effect of an 18-wk weight-training program on average daily metabolic
rate (ADMR). Before the intervention and in weeks
8 and 18 (T 0 ,
T 8 , and
T 18 , respectively) data on body
composition, sleeping metabolic rate (SMR), food intake, energy cost of
the weight-training program
(EE ex ), and nontraining physical
activity (accelerometer) were collected in the exercise group (EXER,
n = 18 males). ADMR was determined in
a subgroup (EX12, n = 12) by using
doubly labeled water. At T 0 and
T 18 , data (except ADMR) were also
collected in a control group (Con, n = 8). Body mass did not change in EXER or Con. Fat-free mass increased only in EXER with 2.1 ± 1.2 kg, whereas fat mass decreased in EXER
as well as Con (2.0 ± 1.8 and 1.4 ± 1.0 kg, respectively). Initial ADMR (12.4 ± 1.2 MJ/day) increased at
T 8 (13.5 ± 1.3 MJ/day, P < 0.001) with no further increase
at T 18 (13.5 ± 1.9 MJ/day). SMR did not change in EXER (4.8 ± 0.5, 4.9 ± 0.5, 4.8 ± 0.5 kJ/min) or Con (4.7 ± 0.4, 4.8 ± 0.4 kJ/min). Energy intake did
not change in EXER (10.1 ± 1.8, 9.7 ± 1.8, 9.2 ± 1.9 MJ/day) or Con (10.2 ± 2.6, 9.4 ± 1.8, 10.1 ± 1.5 MJ/day)
and was systematically underreported in EX12 ( 21 ± 14, 28 ± 18, 34 ± 14%,
P < 0.001).
EE ex (0.47 ± 0.20, 0.50 ± 0.18 MJ/day) could only explain 40% of the increase in ADMR.
Nontraining physical activity did not change in both groups. In
conclusion, although of modest energy cost, weight-training induces a
significant increase in ADMR.
doubly labeled water; accelerometer; sleeping metabolic rate; food
intake; physical exercise
0161-7567/97 $5.00
Copyright © 1997 the American Physiological Society |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 8750-7587 1522-1601 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.1.298 |