Comparing the Effectiveness of Different Techniques for the Management of Dental Implant Peri-Implant Mucositis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing the Effectiveness of Different Techniques for the Management of Dental Implant Peri-Implant Mucositis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Dental implant peri-implant mucositis is a prevalent complication that can lead to implant failure if left untreated. Various management techniques have been proposed, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear of dental implant peri-implant mucositis. A total of 120 patients with peri-impl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pharmacy & bioallied science Vol. 16; no. Suppl 1; pp. S865 - S867
Main Authors: Gupta, Bharti, Gupta, Shekhar, Divya, Divya, Dev, Shruti Vishal, Bhola, Surabhi, Guruprasad, Yadavalli
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: India Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd 01-02-2024
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
Subjects:
Antibiotics
antiseptic mouthwash
bleeding on probing
Clinical trials
Debridement
dental implant
Dental implants
Evidence-based medicine
Implant dentures
laser therapy
Lasers in medicine
Lasers in surgery
Management
Management techniques
Methods
Mucositis
Original
peri-implant mucositis
Plaque index
Statistical analysis
Antiseptic mouthwash
peri-implant mucositis
bleeding on probing
laser therapy
dental implant
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Dental implant peri-implant mucositis is a prevalent complication that can lead to implant failure if left untreated. Various management techniques have been proposed, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear of dental implant peri-implant mucositis. A total of 120 patients with peri-implant mucositis were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: Group A received mechanical debridement alone, Group B received mechanical debridement with adjunctive antiseptic mouthwash, Group C underwent laser therapy, and Group D received a combination of mechanical debridement and systemic antibiotics. Clinical parameters, including bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD), and plaque index (PI), were recorded at baseline and after a three-month follow-up period. At the three-month follow-up, significant improvements were observed in all treatment groups. However, Group D, which received a combination of mechanical debridement and systemic antibiotics, showed the most substantial reduction in BOP (mean reduction of 78.2%), PPD (mean reduction of 2.5 mm), and PI (mean reduction of 1.7). Group C, treated with laser therapy, demonstrated the second-best outcomes with a mean reduction of 65.4% in BOP, 2.0 mm in PPD, and 1.3 in PI. Groups A and B showed moderate improvements, with no statistically significant differences between them. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) suggests that a combination of mechanical debridement and systemic antibiotics (Group D) is the most effective treatment for managing dental implant peri-implant mucositis, yielding superior clinical outcomes compared to other techniques.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0976-4879
0975-7406
DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1063_23