Comparison of stability of plate fixateurs with parallel and oblique screw directions
One of the main failure mechanisms of modern plate fixateurs is the tearing of the whole plate-screw construct out of the osteoporotic bone. The aim of this study was to show whether an oblique screw placement can improve the fixation of the plate to the bone. A steel probe was fixed to a synthetic...
Saved in:
Published in: | Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie Vol. 153; no. 2; p. 160 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | German |
Published: |
Germany
01-04-2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get more information |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | One of the main failure mechanisms of modern plate fixateurs is the tearing of the whole plate-screw construct out of the osteoporotic bone. The aim of this study was to show whether an oblique screw placement can improve the fixation of the plate to the bone.
A steel probe was fixed to a synthetic bone (Fa. Sawbones) with standard titanium fixed-angle screws in parallel and 55° oblique positioning. We tested the static tear force and the dynamic stability (force distance 1.4 or 1.6 mm, 610 and 900 N, frequency of force shift of 560 or 380/min). Endpoint was a visible tear of the artificial bone. In addition we performed a morphological analysis of the torn fragments.
The maximal tear force was 2.04 kN (1.95-2.13) for oblique and 2.66 kN (2.55-2.77) for parallel placement (p < 0.05). With a parallel positioning a higher number of force shifts were performed before a visual tear appeared. With parallel positioning the screw canal was torn with an intact surrounding corticalis; in oblique positioning the threads remained intact, the corticalis was torn out with a wedge.
An oblique screw positioning does not result in a higher tear force in modern plate fixateurs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1864-6743 |
DOI: | 10.1055/s-0034-1396187 |