Genetic causes of familial hypercholesterolaemia in patients in the UK: relation to plasma lipid levels and coronary heart disease risk

Aims: To determine the relative frequency of mutations in three different genes (low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), APOB, PCSK9), and to examine their effect in development of coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with clinically defined definite familial hypercholesterolaemia in UK. Patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of medical genetics Vol. 43; no. 12; pp. 943 - 949
Main Authors: Humphries, S E, Whittall, R A, Hubbart, C S, Maplebeck, S, Cooper, J A, Soutar, A K, Naoumova, R, Thompson, G R, Seed, M, Durrington, P N, Miller, J P, Betteridge, D J B, Neil, H A W
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01-12-2006
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims: To determine the relative frequency of mutations in three different genes (low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), APOB, PCSK9), and to examine their effect in development of coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with clinically defined definite familial hypercholesterolaemia in UK. Patients and methods: 409 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia patients (158 with CHD) were studied. The LDLR was partially screened by single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) (exons 3, 4, 6–10 and 14) and by using a commercial kit for gross deletions or rearrangements. APOB (p.R3500Q) and PCSK9 (p.D374Y) were detected by specific assays. Coding exons of PCSK9 were screened by SSCP. Results: Mutations were detected in 253 (61.9%) patients: 236 (57.7%) carried LDLR, 10 (2.4%) carried APOB p.Q3500 and 7 (1.7%) PCSK9 p.Y374. No additional mutations were identified in PCSK9. After adjusting for age, sex, smoking and systolic blood pressure, compared to those with no detectable mutation, the odds ratio of having CHD in those with an LDLR mutation was 1.84 (95% CI 1.10 to 3.06), for APOB 3.40 (0.71 to 16.36), and for PCSK9 19.96 (1.88 to 211.5; p = 0.001 overall). The high risk in patients carrying LDLR and PCSK9 p.Y374 was partly explained by their higher pretreatment cholesterol levels (LDLR, PCSK9 and no mutation, 10.29 (1.85), 13.12 and 9.85 (1.90) mmol/l, respectively, p = 0.001). The post-statin treatment lipid profile in PCSK9 p.Y374 carriers was worse than in patients with no identified mutation (LDL-C, 6.77 (1.82) mmol/l v 4.19 (1.26) mmol/l, p = 0.001, HDL-C 1.09 (0.27) mmol/l v 1.36 (0.36) mmol/l, p = 0.03). Conclusions: The higher CHD risk in patients carrying PCSK9 p.Y347 or a detected LDLR mutation supports the usefulness of DNA testing in the diagnosis and management of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Mutations in PCSK9 appear uncommon in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia in UK.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/NVC-7GCZBDRG-1
local:0430943
PMID:17142622
Correspondence to:
 S E Humphries
 Centre for Cardiovascular Genetics, British Heart Foundation Laboratories, The Rayne Building, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, London WC1E 6JJ, UK; rmhaseh@ucl.ac.uk
href:jmedgenet-43-943.pdf
istex:2C0C70644DB4B1BB870C7E34AE7B0047F1DBF38D
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
SourceType-Other Sources-1
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ISSN:0022-2593
1468-6244
1468-6244
DOI:10.1136/jmg.2006.038356