Leveraging the electronic health record (EHR) to support survivorship care planning for bone marrow transplant (BMT) survivors
Abstract only 57 Background: BMT survivors are underrepresented in survivorship research, yet are at high risk for complications. Practice guidelines are vague, non-BMT clinicians are inadequately informed, and communication between BMT and non-BMT clinicians is inconsistent. Our objective is to dev...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of clinical oncology Vol. 36; no. 7_suppl; p. 57 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
01-03-2018
|
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract only
57
Background: BMT survivors are underrepresented in survivorship research, yet are at high risk for complications. Practice guidelines are vague, non-BMT clinicians are inadequately informed, and communication between BMT and non-BMT clinicians is inconsistent. Our objective is to develop EHR-integrated survivorship care planning that is user-centered, supports non-BMT clinician and survivor needs, but does not adversely impact clinical workflow. Methods: A multidisciplinary team of clinicians (primary care, oncology, BMT), engineers, and EHR analysts used a systems engineering approach to identify barriers and facilitators to BMT survivorship care planning. The team identified patient data categories to include in BMT survivorship care plan (SCP) templates, as well as examined tasks, technology, workflows and individual roles and responsibilities necessary to support care planning. Results: Facilitators include: potential for EHR to discretely capture individual diagnosis and treatment data to create accurate SCPs addressing survivor and primary care information needs. Barriers are: lack of EHR inter-operability which prevents sharing of patient data outside the BMT center’s EHR system, reliance on manual entry of critical data elements into the SCP (i.e. majority of the 88 patient data categories, identified by the team, are non-discrete in the EHR), inefficient or absent survivorship workflows, lack of resources (including time, dedicated clinical staff, space, SCP content), poorly defined roles and responsibilities for survivorship care provision, and lack of evidence-based BMT survivorship guidelines. Conclusions: Work system barriers impede use of the EHR to support survivorship care planning. Steps to overcome barriers: design discrete fields in the EHR to support patient-level data capture, re-engineer existing workflows to support survivorship care planning, obtain BMT program consensus on SCP content, and evaluate user-centeredness of SCPs. This research has the potential to improve feasibility and sustainability of survivorship care planning activities, resulting in improved communication and care coordination for BMT survivors. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0732-183X 1527-7755 |
| DOI: | 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.7_suppl.57 |