Modelling Landscape-level Effects of Reduced Herbicide Use in Two Forests in Northern Ontario

In Ontario, forest management planning requires that legal obligations to sustain forest composition and pattern, wildlife habitat, and other values are met, while at the same time addressing, for example, wood supply needs, costs, forest access, and stakeholder concerns. One of the latter is pressu...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Forestry chronicle Vol. 87; no. 2; pp. 290 - 309
Main Authors:	Dacosta, Jennifer, Szuba, Kandyd, Bell, F. Wayne, Moore, Tom, Lennon, Ken, Leach, Jeff, Bazeley, Don, Luckai, Nancy
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	01-03-2011
Subjects:	conifers economics forest management forests hardwood herbicides planning silviculture stakeholders transportation wildlife habitats Ontario
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	In Ontario, forest management planning requires that legal obligations to sustain forest composition and pattern, wildlife habitat, and other values are met, while at the same time addressing, for example, wood supply needs, costs, forest access, and stakeholder concerns. One of the latter is pressure to reduce herbicide use. Stand-level effects of vegetation management alternatives have been documented, but how these effects scale up to the landscape-level and affect the achievement of social, ecological, and economic objectives embedded in forest management plans (FMPs) remains uncertain. We applied nine modelling scenarios in the context of approved FMPs to explore the potential landscape-level effects of replacing herbicide use with an alternative (brush saw) for two large forests in northeastern Ontario. Results of non-spatial and spatial modelling over 60 years suggested that although herbicides are applied to only 25% to 34% of the harvested area in these forests, reductions in use would affect: (i) overall wood supply, with 14% to 44% less conifer and 6% to 17% less hardwood available; (ii) habitat supply, with less habitat for species preferring recent disturbances and more habitat for species preferring mature and older forest; (iii) costs, with wood transportation cost increasing by 16% to 20% and increased spending on silviculture; (iv) size and distribution of cutblocks and disturbance patches, with more small patches; and (v) the extent of the active road network, which would increase.
ISSN:	0015-7546 1499-9315
DOI:	10.5558/tfc2011-015