Comparative randomised trial of high and conventional doses of praziquantel in the treatment of schistosomiasis mansoni
The efficacy of oral praziquantel in the treatment of schistosomiasis has been considered low by most public health institutions. In this paper, we compared the efficacy of two dosages of praziquantel (80 mg/kg vs. 50 mg/kg) in patients with chronic schistosomiasis mansoni. Two hundred eighty-eight...
Saved in:
Published in: | Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz Vol. 105; no. 4; pp. 445 - 448 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Brazil
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz
01-07-2010
Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The efficacy of oral praziquantel in the treatment of schistosomiasis
has been considered low by most public health institutions. In this
paper, we compared the efficacy of two dosages of praziquantel (80
mg/kg vs. 50 mg/kg) in patients with chronic schistosomiasis mansoni.
Two hundred eighty-eight patients with schistosomiasis from a community
in Brazil were randomly divided into two groups: 145 patients (Group 1)
received 80 mg/kg body weight of oral praziquantel divided in two equal
doses with 1 h interval and 143 patients (Group 2) received 50 mg/kg
body weight of oral praziquantel. To keep the study masked, patients in
Group 2 received placebo 1 h after the first dose. All patients were
subjected to clinical and ultrasonographic examination. Cure assessment
was performed by re- peating two stool examinations, by a quantitative
method, at 30, 90 and 180 days after treatment. The morbidity of
schistosomiasis was low, with a few cases of light periportal
thickening and 16 cases of mild splenomegaly. The cure rates were 89.7%
for Group 1 and 83.9% for Group 2. There was no difference in the
efficacy of both therapeutic dosages of praziquantel assayed. The
adverse reactions were more frequent with higher dosage. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1678-8060 0074-0276 1678-8060 0074-0276 |
DOI: | 10.1590/S0074-02762010000400015 |