Additional use of extrinsic warmer for intravenous CT contrast media and its impact on incidence of contrast extravasations and allergic like reactions: a prospective observational case control study

To prospectively determine whether extrinsic warming of the low-osmolality CT contrast media (Iohexol 350, Iodixanol 320, Iopromide 300, and Iopamidol 300) to 37°C prior to intravenous administration affects extravasation and allergic-like reaction rates. This large scale prospective case control st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical radiology Vol. 79; no. 11; pp. 851 - 860
Main Authors: Mahajan, A., Gupta, A., Shukla, S., Agarwal, U., Rai, P., Sable, N., Venugopal, A.P., Sunthar, P., Banwar, P., Rane, P.B., Thakur, M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-11-2024
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To prospectively determine whether extrinsic warming of the low-osmolality CT contrast media (Iohexol 350, Iodixanol 320, Iopromide 300, and Iopamidol 300) to 37°C prior to intravenous administration affects extravasation and allergic-like reaction rates. This large scale prospective case control study of adverse events included all the patients between the age group of 15–80 years undergoing routine contrast–enhanced computed tomographic (CECT) examinations from April 2018 to March 2020 at our institute. Ex vivo experiments were also performed to demonstrate change in contrast viscosity and fluid dynamics in relation to temperature. A total of 24,379 CECTs were conducted during the study period. Extrinsic warming showed a significant decrease in extravasation rates for Iohexol 350 at flow rates <3.5 mL/sec (P=0.037). No significant difference was observed with Iopromide 300 (P=0.432). Overall, a significant decrease in allergic reactions and overall contrast-related reactions (excluding physiologic reactions) was noted (P<0.001), with Iohexol 350. However, no significant difference was found with Iopromide 300. The most common physiological reaction was a sense of warmth, more prevalent in the warmed group, aligning with ex-vivo experiments demonstrating decreased viscosity with contrast warming. Extrinsic warming of contrast helps reduce the incidence of allergic-like reactions and extravasations for Iohexol 350, but no significant difference was noted with Iopromide 300 even at low injection rates (<3.5 mL/sec). •Warming contrast media to 37°C significantly reduces adverse reactions.•Iohexol 350 showed fewer extravasations and allergic reactions when warmed.•No significant difference in reactions for warmed vs. non-warmed Iopromide 300.•Physiologic reactions like nausea are higher with non-warmed contrast media.•Study supports extrinsic warming of CT contrast for reducing adverse effects.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0009-9260
1365-229X
1365-229X
DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2024.08.013