Xpert® MTB/RIF for smear-negative presumptive TB: impact on case notification in DR Congo
SETTING: The impact of Xpert® MTB/RIF as a follow-on diagnostic test after smear microscopy on tuberculosis (TB) notification has not yet been well defined.DESIGN: Quasi-experimental design with 86 evaluation and 49 control clinics in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. Smear microscopy was supp...
Saved in:
Published in: | The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 240 - 246 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
France
International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
01-02-2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | SETTING: The impact of Xpert® MTB/RIF as a follow-on diagnostic test after smear microscopy on tuberculosis (TB) notification has not yet been well defined.DESIGN: Quasi-experimental design with 86 evaluation and 49 control clinics in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic
of Congo. Smear microscopy was supported at all 135 clinics, Xpert was placed in 15 evaluation clinics and a sputum transport system was implemented for 25 satellite clinics. The number of cases notified before and during the project (July 2012-June 2013) was obtained from the National
TB Program.RESULTS: Of 27 147 presumptive TB cases presenting in clinics with access to Xpert, 5922 (21.8%) were smear-positive. Of 18 636 individuals with 3 negative microscopy results, 6920 (37.1%) underwent Xpert testing, 991 (14.3%) of whom tested positive. The number
of bacteriologically positive cases increased equally in evaluation clinics (15.1%, 95%CI −2.3 to 32.6) and control clinics (13.6%, 95%CI 2.6-29.3), for a difference in increase of 1.5% (95%CI −28.8 to 31.8). There was no difference in the change in smear-negative cases (−42.4%,
95%CI −111.5 to 26.6), nor in all types of TB notified (−6.1%, 95%CI −32.5 to 20.4) between the evaluation and control clinics.CONCLUSION: In part due to a restrictive algorithm, Xpert as follow-on to smear microscopy did not increase the overall number of TB notifications,
nor the number of bacteriologically positive cases. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | (R) Medicine - General 1027-3719(20160201)20:2L.240;1- ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1027-3719 1815-7920 |
DOI: | 10.5588/ijtld.15.0177 |