Functional and vascular neuroimaging in maritime pilots with long-term sleep disruption
The mechanism underlying the possible causal association between long-term sleep disruption and Alzheimer’s disease remains unclear Musiek et al. 2015. A hypothesised pathway through increased brain amyloid load was not confirmed in previous work in our cohort of maritime pilots with long-term work-...
Saved in:
| Published in: | GeroScience |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
12-11-2024
|
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The mechanism underlying the possible causal association between long-term sleep disruption and Alzheimer’s disease remains unclear Musiek et al. 2015. A hypothesised pathway through increased brain amyloid load was not confirmed in previous work in our cohort of maritime pilots with long-term work-related sleep disruption Thomas et al. Alzheimer’s Res Ther 2020;12:101. Here, using functional MRI, T2-FLAIR, and arterial spin labeling MRI scans, we explored alternative neuroimaging biomarkers related to both sleep disruption and AD: resting-state network co-activation and between-network connectivity of the default mode network (DMN), salience network (SAL) and frontoparietal network (FPN), vascular damage and cerebral blood flow (CBF). We acquired data of 16 maritime pilots (56 ± 2.3 years old) with work-related long-term sleep disruption (23 ± 4.8 working years) and 16 healthy controls (59 ± 3.3 years old), with normal sleep patterns (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index ≤ 5). Maritime pilots did not show altered co-activation in either the DMN, FPN, or SAL and no differences in between-network connectivity. We did not detect increased markers of vascular damage in maritime pilots, and additionally, maritime pilots did not show altered CBF-patterns compared to healthy controls. In summary, maritime pilots with long-term sleep disruption did not show neuroimaging markers indicative of preclinical AD compared to healthy controls. These findings do not resemble those of short-term sleep deprivation studies. This could be due to resiliency to sleep disruption or selection bias, as participants have already been exposed to and were able to deal with sleep disruption for multiple years, or to compensatory mechanisms Mentink et al. PLoS ONE. 2021;15(12):e0237622. This suggests the relationship between sleep disruption and AD is not as strong as previously implied in studies on short-term sleep deprivation, which would be beneficial for all shift workers suffering from work-related sleep disruptions. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 2509-2723 2509-2723 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11357-024-01417-4 |