Impact of Sampling Type, Frequency, and Scale of the Collection System on SARS-CoV-2 Quantification Fidelity
With the rapid onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, wastewater-based epidemiology sampling methodologies for SARS-CoV-2 were often implemented quickly and may not have considered the unique drainage catchment characteristics. This study assessed the impact of grab versus composite sampling on the detecti...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Environmental science & technology letters Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 160 - 165 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
American Chemical Society
08-02-2022
|
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | With the rapid onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, wastewater-based epidemiology sampling methodologies for SARS-CoV-2 were often implemented quickly and may not have considered the unique drainage catchment characteristics. This study assessed the impact of grab versus composite sampling on the detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in four different catchment scales with flow rates ranging from high flow (wastewater treatment plant influent) to medium flow (neighborhood scale) to low-flow (city block scale) to ultralow flow (building scale). At the high-flow site, grab samples were comparable to 24 h composite samples with SARS-CoV-2 detected in all samples and differed in concentration from the composite by <1 log 10 unit. However, as the size of the catchment decreased, the percentage of negative grab samples increased despite all respective composites being positive, and the SARS-CoV-2 concentrations of grab samples varied from those of the composites by up to almost 2 log 10 units. At the ultra-low-flow site, increased sampling frequencies generated composite samples with higher fidelity to the 5 min composite, which is the closest estimate of the true SARS-CoV-2 composite concentration that could be measured. Thus, composite sampling is more likely to compensate for temporal signal variability while grab samples do not, especially as the catchment basin size decreases. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 This article is made available via the ACS COVID-19 subset for unrestricted RESEARCH re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
| ISSN: | 2328-8930 2328-8930 |
| DOI: | 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00882 |