Improving TB control: efficiencies of case-finding interventions in Nigeria

SETTING: KNCV Nigeria implements seven key TB case-finding interventions. It was critical to evaluate the efficiency of these interventions in terms of TB yield to direct future prioritisation in the country.OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficiency of active case-finding (ACF) interventions for TB in N...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Public health action Vol. 13; no. 3; pp. 90 - 96
Main Authors:	Babayi, A. P., Odume, B. B., Ogbudebe, C. L., Chukwuogo, O., Nwokoye, N., Dim, C. C., Useni, S., Nongo, D., Eneogu, R., Chijioke-Akaniro, O., Anyaike, C.
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 21-09-2023
Subjects:	Kncv Nigeria Original Portable Digital X-Ray Presumptive Tb Yield Tb Case Yield Efficiency Tb Interventions Who 4-Symptom Screen
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	SETTING: KNCV Nigeria implements seven key TB case-finding interventions. It was critical to evaluate the efficiency of these interventions in terms of TB yield to direct future prioritisation in the country.OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficiency of active case-finding (ACF) interventions for TB in Nigeria.DESIGN: Data from the 2020-2022 implementing period were analysed retrospectively. Intervention efficiencies were analysed using the number needed to screen (NNS), the number needed to test (NNT) and the true screen-positive (TSP) rate.RESULTS: Across the interventions, 21,704,669 persons were screened for TB, 1,834,447 (8.5%) were presumed to have TB (7.7% pre-diagnostic drop-out rate) and 122,452 were diagnosed with TB (TSP rate of 7.2%). The average TSP rate of interventions that used both the WHO four-symptom screen (W4SS) and portable digital X-ray (PDX) screening algorithm was significantly higher (22.6%) than those that employed the former alone (7.0%; OR 3.9, 95% CI 3.74-3.98; P < 0.001). The average NNT for interventions with W4SS/PDX screening was 4 (range: 4-5), while that of W4SS-only screening was 14 (range: 11-22).CONCLUSIONS: Interventions using the PDX in addition to W4SS for TB screening were more efficient in terms of TB case yield than interventions that used symptom-based TB screening only.
Bibliography:	2220-8372(20230921)13:3L.90;1- ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
ISSN:	2220-8372 2220-8372
DOI:	10.5588/pha.23.0028