Pectoral nerve blocks for breast surgery: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDPectoral nerve blocks (PECS block) might be an interesting new regional anaesthetic technique in patients undergoing breast surgery. OBJECTIVEThe aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate postoperative pain outcomes and adverse events of a PECS block compared with no treatment, sham tre...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	European journal of anaesthesiology Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 383 - 393
Main Authors:	Meißner, Michael, Austenfeld, Ece, Kranke, Peter, Zahn, Peter K., Pogatzki-Zahn, Esther M., Meyer-Frießem, Christine H., Weibel, Stephanie, Schnabel, Alexander
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	England Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01-04-2021 European Society of Anaesthesiology
Subjects:	Breast Neoplasms Female Humans Nerve Block - adverse effects Pain, Postoperative - diagnosis Pain, Postoperative - epidemiology Pain, Postoperative - etiology Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Thoracic Nerves
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	BACKGROUNDPectoral nerve blocks (PECS block) might be an interesting new regional anaesthetic technique in patients undergoing breast surgery. OBJECTIVEThe aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate postoperative pain outcomes and adverse events of a PECS block compared with no treatment, sham treatment or other regional anaesthetic techniques in women undergoing breast surgery. DESIGNWe performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCT) with meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. DATA SOURCESThe databases MEDLINE, CENTRAL (until December 2019) and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIAAll RCTs investigating the efficacy and adverse events of PECS compared with sham treatment, no treatment or other regional anaesthetic techniques in women undergoing breast surgery with general anaesthesia were included. RESULTSA total of 24 RCTs (1565 patients) were included. PECS (compared with no treatment) block might reduce pain at rest [mean difference −1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.1 to −0.18, moderate quality evidence] but we are uncertain regarding the effect on pain during movement at 24 h after surgery (mean difference −1.79, 95% CI, −3.5 to −0.08, very low-quality evidence). We are also uncertain about the effect of PECS block on pain at rest at 24 h compared with sham block (mean difference −0.83, 95% CI, −1.80 to 0.14) or compared with paravertebral block (PVB) (mean difference −0.18, 95% CI, −1.0 to 0.65), both with very low-quality evidence. PECS block may have no effect on pain on movement at 24 h after surgery compared with PVB block (mean difference −0.56, 95% CI, −1.53 to 0.41, low-quality evidence). Block-related complications were generally poorly reported. CONCLUSIONThere is moderate quality evidence that PECS block compared with no treatment reduces postoperative pain intensity at rest. The observed results were less pronounced if patients received a sham block. Furthermore, PECS blocks might be equally effective as PVBs. Due to mostly low-quality or very low-quality evidence level, further research is warranted. PROTOCOL REGISTRATIONCRD42019126733.
Bibliography:	ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:	0265-0215 1365-2346
DOI:	10.1097/EJA.0000000000001403