Search Results - "Arnell, Karen"

Refine Results
  1. 1

    Hyper-binding: the surprising roles of age and affect by Chung, Andrew, Arnell, Karen M.

    Published in Psychological research (01-02-2025)
    “…When irrelevant stimuli are processed and then bound to relevant stimuli in memory, it is known as hyper-binding. Hyper-binding has been demonstrated…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  2. 2

    Resting EEG in alpha and beta bands predicts individual differences in attentional breadth by Pitchford, Brent, Arnell, Karen M.

    Published in Consciousness and cognition (01-10-2019)
    “…•Lateralized pre-trial alpha power has previously been shown to predict global/local attention.•Examined individual differences in attentional breadth and EEG…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  3. 3

    Evaluating individual differences in rewarded Stroop performance: reliability and associations with self-report measures by Pitchford, Brent, Arnell, Karen M.

    Published in Psychological research (01-04-2023)
    “…In three separate experiments, we examined the reliability of and relationships between self-report measures and behavioral response time measures of reward…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  4. 4

    Lost in the forest, stuck in the trees: dispositional global/local bias is resistant to exposure to high and low spatial frequencies by Dale, Gillian, Arnell, Karen M

    Published in PloS one (03-07-2014)
    “…Visual stimuli can be perceived at a broad, "global" level, or at a more focused, "local" level. While research has shown that many individuals demonstrate a…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  5. 5

    Self-control and its influence on global/local processing: An investigation of the role of frontal alpha asymmetry and dispositional approach tendencies by Pitchford, Brent, Arnell, Karen M.

    Published in Attention, perception & psychophysics (01-01-2019)
    “…People often inhibit or override their dominant response tendencies in order to complete tasks successfully. Exerting such self-control has been shown to…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  6. 6

    Investigating the stability of and relationships among global/local processing measures by Dale, Gillian, Arnell, Karen M.

    Published in Attention, perception & psychophysics (01-04-2013)
    “…Global/local stimuli have been used to estimate global processing biases in individuals and groups, as well as in response to various manipulations. Throughout…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  7. 7

    Individual Differences in Attentional Breadth Changes Over Time: An Event-Related Potential Investigation by Pitchford, Brent, Arnell, Karen M

    Published in Frontiers in psychology (23-03-2021)
    “…Event-related potentials (ERPs) to hierarchical stimuli have been compared for global/local target trials, but the pattern of results across studies is mixed…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  8. 8

    Speech of young offenders as a function of their psychopathic tendencies by Pitchford, Brent, Arnell, Karen M

    “…The purpose of this study was to analyse young psychopathic offenders' speech compared with controls and to determine whether it was dissimilar. An examination…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  9. 9

    Personality predicts temporal attention costs in the attentional blink paradigm by MacLean, Mary H., Arnell, Karen M.

    Published in Psychonomic bulletin & review (01-08-2010)
    “…Accuracy for a second target is reduced when it is presented within 500 msec of a first target. This phenomenon is called the attentional blink (AB). A…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  10. 10

    A conceptual and methodological framework for measuring and modulating the attentional blink by MacLean, Mary H., Arnell, Karen M.

    Published in Attention, perception & psychophysics (01-08-2012)
    “…The attentional blink (AB) is a transient attention cost that is shown when report accuracy for a second target (T2) is reduced when T2 is presented within…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  11. 11

    Multiple measures of dispositional global/local bias predict attentional blink magnitude by Dale, Gillian, Arnell, Karen M.

    Published in Psychological research (01-07-2015)
    “…When the second of two targets (T2) is presented temporally close to the first target (T1) in a rapid serial visual presentation stream, accuracy to identify…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  12. 12

    Do emotion-induced blindness and the attentional blink share underlying mechanisms? An event-related potential study of emotionally-arousing words by MacLeod, Jeffrey, Stewart, Brandie M., Newman, Aaron J., Arnell, Karen M.

    “…When two targets are presented within approximately 500 ms of each other in the context of rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), participants’ ability to…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  13. 13

    Between-person variation in naturally occurring affect does not relate to working memory performance: a latent variable modelling study by Chung, Andrew, Busseri, Michael A., Arnell, Karen M.

    Published in Psychological research (01-07-2021)
    “…Some studies have shown that induced positive and negative affective states have differential effects on verbal and spatial working memory (WM) performance,…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  14. 14

    Resting EEG in alpha and beta bands predicts individual differences in attentional blink magnitude by MacLean, Mary H., Arnell, Karen M., Cote, Kimberly A.

    Published in Brain and cognition (01-04-2012)
    “…► Greater alpha power while at rest associated with larger AB magnitudes. ► Greater beta power while at rest associated with smaller AB magnitudes. ►…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  15. 15

    Greater attentional blink magnitude is associated with higher levels of anticipatory attention as measured by alpha event-related desynchronization (ERD) by MacLean, Mary H, Arnell, Karen M

    Published in Brain research (28-04-2011)
    “…Abstract Accuracy for a second target (T2) is reduced when it is presented within 500 ms of a first target (T1) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP)—an…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  16. 16

    Individual differences in dispositional focus of attention predict attentional blink magnitude by Dale, Gillian, Arnell, Karen M.

    Published in Attention, perception & psychophysics (01-04-2010)
    “…When identifying two targets presented in a rapid serial visual presentation stream, one’s accuracy on the second target is reduced if it is presented shortly…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  17. 17

    Blinded by Emotion: Target Misses Follow Attention Capture by Arousing Distractors in RSVP by Arnell, Karen M, Killman, Kassandra V, Fijavz, David

    Published in Emotion (Washington, D.C.) (01-08-2007)
    “…Participants are usually able to search rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) streams and report a single target, given that RSVP distractors do not…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  18. 18

    Capturing and holding attention: The impact of emotional words in rapid serial visual presentation by Mathewson, Karen J., Arnell, Karen M., Mansfield, Craig A.

    Published in Memory & cognition (2008)
    “…When two masked, to-be-attended targets are presented within approximately 500 msec of each other, accurate report of the second target (T2) suffers more than…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  19. 19

    Individual differences in naturally occurring affect predict conceptual breadth: evidence for the importance of arousal by valence interactions by Chung, Andrew, Busseri, Michael A., Arnell, Karen M.

    “…Several studies have investigated the effect of induced mood state on conceptual breadth (breadth and flexibility of thought). Early studies concluded that…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  20. 20

    Individual differences within and across attentional blink tasks revisited by Dale, Gillian, Dux, Paul E., Arnell, Karen M.

    Published in Attention, perception & psychophysics (01-04-2013)
    “…When the second of two targets (T2) is presented in close temporal proximity (within 200–500 ms) to the first (T1), the accuracy for reporting T2 is reduced…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article