Quality of life in neurofibromatosis 1: development and validation of a tool dedicated to cutaneous neurofibromas in adults
Background Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF), present in 95% of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), are considered as one of the greatest medical burden because of physical disfigurement. No specific score evaluates their impact on quality of life (QoL). Objective To develop a specific score ass...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Vol. 36; no. 8; pp. 1359 - 1366 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
England
Wiley
01-08-2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background
Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF), present in 95% of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), are considered as one of the greatest medical burden because of physical disfigurement. No specific score evaluates their impact on quality of life (QoL).
Objective
To develop a specific score assessing cNF‐related QoL.
Methods
Through a multidisciplinary workshop including 10 patients, 3 expert‐in‐NF1 physicians, 3 health care workers (nurses and psychologist) and 1 methodologist, the French version of the Skindex‐16 was modified by adding 3 items. The new cNF‐Skindex was validated among patients with NF1 recruited in the ComPaRe online cohort, in France (N = 284). Construct validity was assessed by comparing it with the EQ‐5D‐5L, its visual analogue scale and the MYMOP2 and by assessing its association with patients' characteristics. Reliability was assessed by a test–retest. An English version of the tool was developed using a back‐forward translation.
Results
A total of 228 individuals with NF1, with cNF answered the 19‐item questionnaire. These items fitted into 3 domains: emotions, symptoms, functioning. One was dropped during analysis because >90% responders were not concerned. The cNF‐Skindex significantly correlated with the EQ‐5D‐5L (N = 193) and MYMOP2 (N = 210) indicating good external validity: rs 0.38 (P < 0.001), and 0.58 (P < 0.001), respectively. Having >50 cNF was the only independent variable associated with the total score cNF‐Skindex (β = 15.88, 95%CI 6.96–24.81, P = 0.001), and with the 3 sub‐scores: ‘functioning’ (β = 2.65, 95%CI 0.71–4.59, P = 0.008), ‘emotions’ (β = 17.03, 95%CI 4.11–29.96, P = 0.010) and ‘symptoms’ (β = 3.90, 95%CI 1.95–5.85, P < 0.001). Test–retest reliability (N = 133) found an ICC at 0.96 demonstrating good reproducibility.
Conclusion
The cNF‐Skindex demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. The global and sub‐scores were increased with higher number of cNF arguing for its use in further trials aiming to reduce their number or prevent their development. Cross‐cultural validation and evaluation of its responsiveness are the next steps. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | Funding sources None reported. Conflict of Interest ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 0926-9959 1468-3083 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jdv.18140 |