Innovative approaches in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: comparison of pulsed radiofrequency ablation and surgical intervention
Purpose This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation (PRFA) and surgery for treating chronic plantar fasciitis, focusing on pain relief and functional outcomes. Methods A prospective study involved 30 patients with chronic plantar fasciitis unresponsive to 12 month...
Saved in:
Published in: | International orthopaedics Vol. 48; no. 10; pp. 2719 - 2726 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01-10-2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation (PRFA) and surgery for treating chronic plantar fasciitis, focusing on pain relief and functional outcomes.
Methods
A prospective study involved 30 patients with chronic plantar fasciitis unresponsive to 12 months of conservative treatment. Patients were divided into PRFA (
n
= 17) and surgical (
n
= 13) groups. Clinical evaluations were conducted preoperatively and at three, six and 12 months postoperatively using VAS, AOFAS, FFI, and RMS scores. Radiological measurements assessed foot structure impact.
Results
Both PRFA and surgery significantly reduced pain and improved function. PRFA had a shorter operative time and quicker return to activities (
p
< 0.001). At 3 months, PRFA showed superior VAS, FFI, and RMS scores (
p
< 0.05). Long-term outcomes were similar. No major complications occurred, but minor complications were higher in the surgical group (
p
< 0.01).
Conclusions
PRFA is a minimally invasive, effective treatment for chronic plantar fasciitis with quicker recovery and lower complication rates compared to surgery. Both treatments offer comparable long-term benefits. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0341-2695 1432-5195 1432-5195 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00264-024-06261-x |