Changes in agonist neural drive, hypertrophy and pre-training strength all contribute to the individual strength gains after resistance training
Purpose Whilst neural and morphological adaptations following resistance training (RT) have been investigated extensively at a group level, relatively little is known about the contribution of specific physiological mechanisms, or pre-training strength, to the individual changes in strength followin...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of applied physiology Vol. 117; no. 4; pp. 631 - 640 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01-04-2017
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
Whilst neural and morphological adaptations following resistance training (RT) have been investigated extensively at a group level, relatively little is known about the contribution of specific physiological mechanisms, or pre-training strength, to the individual changes in strength following training. This study investigated the contribution of multiple underpinning neural [agonist EMG (QEMG
MVT
), antagonist EMG (HEMG
ANTAG
)] and morphological variables [total quadriceps volume (QUADS
VOL
), and muscle fascicle pennation angle (QUADS
θ
p
)], as well as pre-training strength, to the individual changes in strength after 12 weeks of knee extensor RT.
Methods
Twenty-eight healthy young men completed 12 weeks of isometric knee extensor RT (3/week). Isometric maximum voluntary torque (MVT) was assessed pre- and post-RT, as were simultaneous neural drive to the agonist (QEMG
MVT
) and antagonist (HEMG
ANTAG
). In addition QUADS
VOL
was determined with MRI and QUADS
θ
p
with B-mode ultrasound.
Results
Percentage changes (∆) in MVT were correlated to ∆QEMG
MVT
(
r
= 0.576,
P
= 0.001), ∆QUADS
VOL
(
r
= 0.461,
P
= 0.014), and pre-training MVT (
r
= −0.429,
P
= 0.023), but not ∆HEMG
ANTAG
(
r
= 0.298,
P
= 0.123) or ∆QUADS
θ
p
(
r
= −0.207,
P
= 0.291). Multiple regression analysis revealed 59.9% of the total variance in ∆MVT after RT to be explained by ∆QEMG
MVT
(30.6%), ∆QUADS
VOL
(18.7%), and pre-training MVT (10.6%).
Conclusions
Changes in agonist neural drive, quadriceps muscle volume and pre-training strength combined to explain the majority of the variance in strength changes after knee extensor RT (~60%) and adaptations in agonist neural drive were the most important single predictor during this short-term intervention. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1439-6319 1439-6327 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00421-017-3560-x |