Semantic representations in the temporal pole predict false memories
Recent advances in neuroscience have given us unprecedented insight into the neural mechanisms of false memory, showing that artificial memories can be inserted into the memory cells of the hippocampus in a way that is indistinguishable from true memories. However, this alone is not enough to explai...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 113; no. 36; pp. 10180 - 10185 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
06-09-2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Recent advances in neuroscience have given us unprecedented insight into the neural mechanisms of false memory, showing that artificial memories can be inserted into the memory cells of the hippocampus in a way that is indistinguishable from true memories. However, this alone is not enough to explain how false memories can arise naturally in the course of our daily lives. Cognitive psychology has demonstrated that many instances of false memory, both in the laboratory and the real world, can be attributed to semantic interference. Whereas previous studies have found that a diverse set of regions show some involvement in semantic false memory, none have revealed the nature of the semantic representations underpinning the phenomenon. Here we use fMRI with representational similarity analysis to search for a neural code consistent with semantic false memory. We find clear evidence that false memories emerge from a similarity-based neural code in the temporal pole, a region that has been called the “semantic hub” of the brain. We further show that each individual has a partially unique semantic code within the temporal pole, and this unique code can predict idiosyncratic patterns of memory errors. Finally, we show that the same neural code can also predict variation in true-memory performance, consistent with an adaptive perspective on false memory. Taken together, our findings reveal the underlying structure of neural representations of semantic knowledge, and how this semantic structure can both enhance and distort our memories. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Contributed by Daniel L. Schacter, July 4, 2016 (sent for review May 23, 2016; reviewed by Guillen Fernandez and Kathleen B. McDermott) 2H.J.S. and D.H. contributed equally to this work. Author contributions: M.J.C., D.K., D.L.S., H.J.S., and D.H. designed research; M.J.C. and R.S.A. performed research; M.J.C. and R.S.A. analyzed data; and M.J.C., D.K., D.L.S., H.J.S., and D.H. wrote the paper. Reviewers: G.F., Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; and K.B.M., Washington University in St. Louis. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1610686113 |