Impact of hospitalisation on the outcome of adolescent anorexia nervosa

Owing to the lack of controlled trials of treatment setting in adolescent anorexia nervosa, the benefits and costs of in-patient treatment are not established. To clarify the relationship between a range of presenting features, treatment received and medium- to long-term outcome in adolescent anorex...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	British journal of psychiatry Vol. 176; no. 2; pp. 138 - 141
Main Authors:	Gowers, S. G., An, J. Weetm, Shore, A., Hossain, F., Elvins, R.
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01-02-2000 RCP
Subjects:	Adolescent Adolescents Age Anorexia Anorexia Nervosa - psychology Anorexia Nervosa - therapy Clinical trials Eating disorders Female Health care expenditures Hospitalization Humans Inpatient care Interviews Long term Male Menstruation Multivariate Analysis Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Patient admissions Patients Prognosis Prospective Studies Psychiatry Regression analysis Retrospective Studies Severity of Illness Index Teenagers Variables
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Owing to the lack of controlled trials of treatment setting in adolescent anorexia nervosa, the benefits and costs of in-patient treatment are not established. To clarify the relationship between a range of presenting features, treatment received and medium- to long-term outcome in adolescent anorexia nervosa. A range of presenting variables were rated for 75 cases of DSM-III-R anorexia nervosa at presentation to an adolescent service, including the Morgan-Russell Global Assessment Score. Cases were followed up at 2-7 years and outcome rated according to reliable methods. Setting of treatment received was also recorded. Two out of 75 cases had died by the time of follow-up. Adequate data for 72 enabled an outcome category to be assigned. The 21 who had received inpatient treatment had a significantly worse outcome than the 51 never admitted to hospital. Multivariate analysis suggests admission to be the major predictor of poor outcome. The benefits and costs of admission to hospital require further investigation, ideally in a randomised-controlled trial. The negative consequences of in-patient treatment are neglected in research.
Bibliography:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
ISSN:	0007-1250 1472-1465
DOI:	10.1192/bjp.176.2.138