Advancing patient-centricity in Medical Affairs: A survey of patients and patient organizations

[Display omitted] •Patient perspective added to the original patient-centricity framework.•Digital health and patient medical education were new focus areas in the literature review.•Survey results indicate agreement but online vs in-person communication differences.•Medical Affairs can translate pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drug discovery today Vol. 28; no. 7; p. 103604
Main Authors: Amin, Dahlia, Vandenbroucke, Pol
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-07-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Patient perspective added to the original patient-centricity framework.•Digital health and patient medical education were new focus areas in the literature review.•Survey results indicate agreement but online vs in-person communication differences.•Medical Affairs can translate patient needs or preferences into clinical insights.•Patient-friendly medical communication is another crucial aspect to prioritize. Current guidance on advancing patient-centricity in Medical Affairs is insufficient. A framework was previously proposed from a Medical Affairs perspective, without direct patient input, featuring five focus areas: medical strategy; medical communication; evidence generation; patient engagement; and patient care experience. We conducted a literature review to evaluate and provide background on those focus areas. Consequently, two new focus areas were identified: digital health and patient medical education. Because the patient perspective provides an important value-add, we consulted on the seven priority areas identified with patient and patient organizations through questionnaires. The gathered responses implied that they were accurately prioritized to increase patient-centricity. However, this must be tested on a larger sample size to validate its feasibility.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1359-6446
1878-5832
DOI:10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103604