Randomized efficacy and safety trial of once-daily remogliflozin etabonate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes
The sodium‐dependent glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor remogliflozin etabonate (RE) was evaluated in a 12‐week, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐ and active‐controlled, parallel‐group study. A total of 252 newly diagnosed and drug‐naïve people with type 2 diabetes and glycated haemoglobin (Hb...
Saved in:
Published in: | Diabetes, obesity & metabolism Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 98 - 101 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-01-2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The sodium‐dependent glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor remogliflozin etabonate (RE) was evaluated in a 12‐week, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐ and active‐controlled, parallel‐group study. A total of 252 newly diagnosed and drug‐naïve people with type 2 diabetes and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentrations of 7.0–≤9.5% (53–80 mmol/mol) were recruited. Participants were randomized to RE (100, 250, 500 or 1000 mg once daily or 250 mg twice daily), placebo or 30 mg pioglitazone once daily. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c concentration from baseline. Secondary endpoints included changes in fasting plasma glucose, body weight and lipid profiles, safety and tolerability. We observed a statistically significant trend in the RE dose–response relationship for change from baseline in HbA1c at week 12 (p < 0.047). RE was generally well tolerated and no effects on LDL cholesterol were observed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-FSC9B747-D istex:8FB85A5BD07EA2CCFAB9C1B20DF90770F9E13FA3 Figure S1. Mean change in glycated haemoglobin concentration from baseline (±standard error) for each visit (LOCF) in the intent-to-treat population.Figure S2. Mean change in fasting plasma glucose concentrations from baseline (±standard error) for each visit (LOCF) in the intent-to-treat population.Figure S3. Mean change in body weight from baseline (±standard error) for each visit (LOCF) in the intent-to-treat population.Table S1. Participant disposition (all participants).Table S2. Summary of demographic characteristics (intent-to-treat population).Table S3. Summary of most common (≥5% participants in any group) on-therapy adverse events by treatment (safety population). ArticleID:DOM12393 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1462-8902 1463-1326 |
DOI: | 10.1111/dom.12393 |