The influence of biphasic positive airway pressure vs. sham biphasic positive airway pressure on pulmonary function in morbidly obese patients after bariatric surgery

The effect of biphasic positive airway pressure (BPAP) at individualized pressures on the postoperative pulmonary recovery of morbidly obese patients (MOP) undergoing open bariatric surgery (OBS) and possible device-related effects (sham BPAP) were investigated. Forty-eight MOP scheduled for OBS wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anaesthesiology intensive therapy : official publication of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Vol. 51; no. 2; pp. 88 - 95
Main Authors: Alexandropoulou, Aikaterini N, Louis, Konstantinos, Papakonstantinou, Alexandros, Tzirogiannis, Konstantinos, Stamataki, Elissavet, Roussos, Charis, Alchanatis, Manos, Gratziou, Christina, Vagiakis, Emanouil, Roditis, Konstantinos
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Poland Termedia sp. z o.o 01-01-2019
Termedia Publishing House
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The effect of biphasic positive airway pressure (BPAP) at individualized pressures on the postoperative pulmonary recovery of morbidly obese patients (MOP) undergoing open bariatric surgery (OBS) and possible device-related effects (sham BPAP) were investigated. Forty-eight MOP scheduled for OBS were initially enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned to: A) the BPAP group in which BPAP, at individualized inspiratory positive airway pressure/expiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP/EPAP), was applied for 3 days postoperatively and B) the sham BPAP group in which sham BPAP was applied for the same time. Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry 24 h prior to surgery and at 24, 48 and 72 h postoperatively and respiratory complications were recorded. Thirty-five subjects, 21 in the BPAP group and 14 in the sham BPAP group, completed the study. Baseline characteristics and pulmonary function were similar between groups preoperatively. Subjects in the BPAP group showed in general better spirometric performance and SpO2 values postoperatively and expedited pulmonary recovery. Atelectasis combined with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) symptoms was observed in 21% of subjects in the sham BPAP group and one of these subjects developed lower respiratory tract infection. No respiratory complications were recorded in the BPAP group. Use of higher BPAP pressures was not associated with anastomosis leakage or disruption in any patient. Use of BPAP, at individualized pressures, expedites postoperative pulmonary recovery and eliminates respiratory complications in MOP who have undergone OBS.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1642-5758
1731-2531
DOI:10.5114/ait.2019.85868