Characteristics of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma in Colombia: Results of the Epidemiologic Registry of Malignant Melanoma REMMEC ACHO

e21530 Background: The features and prognostic factors of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma are not well established in our country. Our objective is to collect and analyze the characteristics of a cohort of Colombian patients. Methods: Analytical cohort study based on the Epidemiologic Re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical oncology Vol. 42; no. 16_suppl; p. e21530
Main Authors: Ospina Serrano, Aylen Vanessa, Ortiz Diaz, Juan David, Contreras, Fernando, Munevar, Isabel, Jimenez, Paola, Mantilla, William Armando, Idrobo, Henry, Ramos, Pedro, Manneh Kopp, Ray, Arango Acevedo, Natalia, Santa, Daniel Andres, Rivas Tafurt, Giovanna Patricia, Quiroga, Alicia, Vargas, Claudia, Yepes, Andres, Alcala Castro, Carmen Marcela, Lema, Mauricio, Chinchia, Isabel, Russi Noguera, July Andrea, Triana, Ivan Camilo
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 01-06-2024
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:e21530 Background: The features and prognostic factors of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma are not well established in our country. Our objective is to collect and analyze the characteristics of a cohort of Colombian patients. Methods: Analytical cohort study based on the Epidemiologic Registry of Malignant Melanoma in Colombia (REMMEC). Data were collected between January 2011 and December 2023. Patients older than 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced melanoma were included. Descriptive analysis of demographic and clinical characteristics and survival analysis using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier models were performed. Results: 322 patients were included. Median age was 66.5 years (range 55-76), 56% (180) of patients were men, 87% (280) had advanced disease at diagnosis, most (82%) with non-brain metastases and 51% (164) with multiple organ involvement. Table 1. For first-line treatment, patients received single-agent immunotherapy (37.26%), doublet immunotherapy (10.25%), targeted therapy (9%), and chemotherapy (7.14%), while 29% received best supportive care BSC. In the second line, single agent immunotherapy 9.32%, targeted therapy (4.34%), doublet immunotherapy 3.42%, chemotherapy (5%) and 77% received BSC. In the third line, only 9% (29) of patients were able to receive any therapy. Median follow-up was 16 months (IQR 7-32), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 months (IQR 4-35) and median overall survival (OS) was 23 months (IQR 9-66). OS in the first-line setting with immunotherapy as monotherapy was 23 months (IQR 12-40) HR 0.40 P 0.035 and with doublet immunotherapy 16 months (IQR 8-28) HR 0.16 P 0.005 Clinical characteristics associated with lower median OS were brain metastasis (HR 1,95 P 0.001), ECOG 3-4 (HR 5,49 P 0.001) and multiple metastatic disease (HR 2,15 P 0.001). According to acral vs. non-acral histologic type, the median OS was 26 vs. 44 months, respectively (HR 1.30 P 0.26). Conclusions: In our cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma, we found clinical outcomes similar to those reported in the worldwide literature. It is necessary to continue the registry and follow-up of patients to identify specific prognostic factors. [Table: see text]
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.e21530