Correlation of digital flow peak with spirometry in children with and without asthma
Spirometry and peak expiratory flow measurement (PEF) are combined during functional respiratory assessments. The new digital peak flow meter (DPM) evaluates the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV 1 ) and PEF. To compare lung function measurements using spirometry and DPM. This cross-...
Saved in:
| Published in: | The Journal of asthma Vol. 60; no. 2; pp. 270 - 276 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
England
Taylor & Francis
01-02-2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Spirometry and peak expiratory flow measurement (PEF) are combined during functional respiratory assessments. The new digital peak flow meter (DPM) evaluates the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV
1
) and PEF.
To compare lung function measurements using spirometry and DPM.
This cross-sectional analytical study assessed FEV
1
and PEF in children with and without asthma. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the agreement between the measures using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman, and survival agreement plot.
125 (3-12 y) and 196 (6-18 y) children without and with asthma, respectively, were studied. In children without asthma, the ICC for FEV
1
and PEF were 0.89 and 0.86, respectively, while the corresponding values were 0.87 and 0.79, respectively, in patients with asthma. The Bland-Altman method showed a difference of −0.4 to 0.5 for FEV
1
in patients without asthma, with a tendency to increase as the FEV
1
increased to a certain extent. In patients with asthma, the pattern was similar for FEV
1
, and the PEF had a greater dispersion than among those without asthma; however, a good agreement pattern was maintained. In the survival agreement plot, when accepting a tolerance of 0.150 mL for FEV
1
, there was an agreement of close to 55% in both groups. Likewise, when accepting a tolerance of 0.5 L/s for PEF, an agreement of close to 60% and 50% was observed in patients without and with asthma, respectively.
DPM was effective as a measure of lung function in pediatric patients with and without asthma. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 0277-0903 1532-4303 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/02770903.2022.2045308 |