Dosimetric analysis of Rapid Arc (VMAT) treatment planning in head and neck cancer for quality assurance treatment

The current investigation aimed to compare the treatment plans of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) fixed intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and SIB RapidArc (RA) using a number of dosimetric indices. In this study, 29 patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) were considered for treatm...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of King Saud University. Science Vol. 35; no. 2; p. 102476
Main Authors:	Amin, Naima, Atiq, Atia, Ikram, Muhammad, Atiq, Maria, Naeem, Hamza, Yousaf, Muhammad, Farooq, Atiqa, Iqbal, Khalid, Akbar, Anzal
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Elsevier B.V 01-02-2023 Elsevier
Subjects:	Dosimetric parameters IMRT Rapid arc IMRT Dosimetric parameters Rapid arc
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	The current investigation aimed to compare the treatment plans of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) fixed intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and SIB RapidArc (RA) using a number of dosimetric indices. In this study, 29 patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) were considered for treatment plan evaluation of SIB RA and SIB IMRT. The plans were evaluated using conformity index (CI), target coverage (TC), gradient index (GI), external volume Index (EI), homogeneity index (HI), dose heterogeneity index (DHI), standard deviation (SD), and unified dosimetric index (UDI). The dose of each planned target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) was determined using their respective mean and median doses. In accordance with the results, there is no noticeable difference in the values of CI, TC, GI, EI, and UDI for SIB RA and SIB IMRT. DHI of PTV 54 is better for SIB IMRT as compared to SIB RA and DHI of PTV 60, PTV 70 is same for both techniques. HI, SD and sparing of OARs results in better values for SIB RA as compared to SIB IMRT. However, PTV 54 and PTV 60′s doses indicate over dosage. The dose of PTV 70 is found to be within the limits of prescribed dose for both SIB RA and SIB IMRT. SIB RA homogeneity, sparing of OAR, and SD are observed to be superior to SIB IMRT. In the case of RA, less time and a monitor unit are used. In conclusion, SIB RA is thought to be better than SIB IMRT for the treatment of NPC.
ISSN:	1018-3647
DOI:	10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102476