“Undressing” distress among cancer patients living in urban, regional, and remote locations in Western Australia

Purpose People diagnosed with cancer from rural and remote locations may experience heightened distress because of distance from cancer treatment and support services. We examined whether remoteness and other factors are associated with psychosocial distress and explored commonly reported problems a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Supportive care in cancer Vol. 24; no. 5; pp. 1963 - 1973
Main Authors: Watts, Kaaren J., Good, Louise H., McKiernan, Sandy, Miller, Lisa, O’Connor, Moira, Kane, Robert, Kruger, Deborah J., Adams, Bree R., Musiello, Toni
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-05-2016
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose People diagnosed with cancer from rural and remote locations may experience heightened distress because of distance from cancer treatment and support services. We examined whether remoteness and other factors are associated with psychosocial distress and explored commonly reported problems among cancer patients in Western Australia (WA). Methods In a cross-sectional study, cancer patients newly referred to a Cancer Council WA Cancer Support Coordinator (CSC) were screened and assessed using the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem List (PL) and a standardized form, respectively. The index of remoteness was the Australian Standard Geographical Classification. The association between remoteness, demographic variables, and the frequency of problems endorsed on the PL was analyzed using bivariate analyses and a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) regression. Results Of 1032 patients referred to a CSC, 466 were screened (45.2 %) with complete data available for 441 patients. Patients from remote areas reported fewer problems than patients from urban and regional locations. Increasing remoteness was not associated with higher distress ( r  = −0.04, p  = 0.43). Concerns reported differed by remoteness category and included worry, sadness, fears, finances, transportation, and physical symptoms. More emotional problems were independently associated with higher distress ( β  = 0.47, p  < 0.001), explaining 17.31 % of the variance. Conclusions There is no evidence that increasing remoteness is associated with higher distress. Emotional concerns and physical problems appear to be prevalent among cancer patients irrespective of urban or rural location. Specific concerns detected by distress screening, particularly emotional concerns, may warrant further assessment and targeted referrals.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-015-2982-4