Evaluation of the Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with Myocardial Infarction after Revascularization with Intravenous Real-time Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography

In order to evaluate the left ventricular remodeling in patients with myocardial infarction after revascularization with intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RT-MCE), intravenous RT-MCE was performed on 20 patients with myocardial infarction before coronary revascularization....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 287 - 290
Main Author: 毕小军 邓又斌 申屠伟慧 熊莉 张芸 余芬 黄润青
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Heidelberg Huazhong University of Science and Technology 01-06-2008
Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In order to evaluate the left ventricular remodeling in patients with myocardial infarction after revascularization with intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RT-MCE), intravenous RT-MCE was performed on 20 patients with myocardial infarction before coronary revascularization. Follow-up echocardiography was performed 3 months after coronary revascularization. Segmental wall motion was assessed using 18-segment LV model and classified as normal, hypokinesis, akinesis and dyskinesis. Myocardial perfusion was assessed by visual interpretation and divided into 3 conditions: homogeneous opacification=l; partial or reduced opaciflcation or subendocardial contrast defect=2; constrast defect=3. Myocardial perfusion score index (MPSI) was calculated by dividing the total sum of contrast score by the total number of segments with abnormal wall motion. Twenty patients were classified into 2 groups according to the MPSI: MPSI≤I.5 as good myocardial perfusion, MPSI〉1.5 as poor myocardial perfusion. To assess the left ventricular remodeling, the following comparisons were carried out: (1) Comparisons of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) before and 3 months after revascularization in two groups;(2) Comparisons of LVEF, LVESV and LVEDV pre-revascularization between two groups and comparisons of these 3 months post-revascularization between two groups; (3) Comparisons of the differences in LVEF, LVESV and LVEDV between 3 months post-and pre-revascularization (ALVEF, ALVESV and ALVEDV) between two groups; (4) The linear regression analysis between ALVEF, ALVESV, ALVEDV and MPSI. The results showed that the LVEF obtained 3 months after revascularization in patients with MPSI〉1.5 was obviously lower than that in those with MPSI〈1.5. The LVEDV obtained 3 months post-revascularization in patients with MPSI〉1.5 was obviously larger than that in those with MPSI≤1.5 (P=0.002 and 0.04). The differences in ALVEF and ALVEDV between patients with MPSI〉I.5 and those with MPSI≤1.5 were significant (P=0.002 and 0.001, respectively). Linear regression analysis revealed that MPSI had a negative correlation with ALVEF and a positive correlation with ALVESV, ALVEDV (P=0.004, 0.008, and 0.016, respectively). It was concluded that RT-MCE could accurately evaluate the left ventricular remodeling in patients with myocardial infarction after revascularization.
Bibliography:real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography; myocardial infarction; left ventricularremodeling; revascularization
real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography
R54
revascularization
42-1679/R
left ventricularremodeling
myocardial infarction
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1672-0733
1993-1352
DOI:10.1007/s11596-008-0313-4